AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

SHARPLESS v. SEVIER AND HARRISON.

It is the duty of all tribunals to make an end of disputes by a fair trial, if it can be done consistently with the rules of the Court.

Hence, though a cause has been several years in court, if it has been continued generally or by consent, a nonsuit will be set aside where the affidavit shows that exertions were made to procure certain papers, without which the cause could not be prepared for trial, and they were procured at too late a period to make the necessary preparation. [See M'Allister's Lessee v. Williams, infra, 119.]

When the jury were called to the box, MILLER, the plaintiff's counsel, suffered a nonsuit, and obtained a rule to show cause why it should be set aside.

Upon showing cause he produced his own affidavit, stating that the plaintiff was a citizen of Philadelphia, that since the last term he had written to him for certain papers which he conceived necessary to support the action; that he received for answer, the papers were in the hands of his former attorney, J. White, that, upon inquiry of J. White, he was informed that he had not such papers, upon which he wrote again to the plaintiff, and did not receive the papers alluded to until the Friday before the commencement of this term; and that the reason why he the deponent did not get a commission to take depositions, was, that he did not believe it would answer any purpose without the papers alluded to. The reasons were also stated why it was thought the testimony would be material.

OVERTON, J., sitting alone.

The cause stands upon the same footing as if it were an application at the first term after issue joined. The cause has been continued by consent, either expressed or implied, for a general continuance amounts to implied consent. Therefore, the defendants have no cause to complain of the length of time this cause has been depending. Supposing this the first application for a continuance, according to our practice it would be granted, and consequently the nonsuit ought to be set aside. The cause was continued at the last term, as it had uniformly been before; since which the affidavit shows that exertions have been used to procure certain papers; that they were procured at so late a period as scarcely to afford time to make the necessary preparation, at least it seems reasonable to think so.

The affidavit also states the papers to be material. It is the duty of all judicial tribunals to make an end of disputes by a fair trial, if it can be done consistently with the rules of the Court, — no trial in this case has been had, therefore let the nonsuit be set aside.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHARPLESS v. SEVIER AND HARRISON
(Mar 1, 1805)