Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ROSSEAU v. THORNBERRY. — 2 L. R., 442.

If the clerk of the county court neglect to take a bond from the party previously to issuing a certiorari as directed by the act of 1810 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 4, sec. 16), the Superior Court has power to take bond with good security for the prosecution of the suit.

The question for the Supreme Court is, whether the bond could be received by the Superior Court.

CAMERON, J.

The object of the act of Assembly which requires a bond to be given (according to the directions of the act) by the party obtaining a writ of certiorari is to indemnify the adverse party against the consequences incidental to the removal of the suit.

The clerk of the county court to which the writ goes is directed to take from the applicant such a bond as the act requires. If he fails in the performance of this duty, the ends of justice can no otherwise be attained than by such bond being taken in this Court, before a trial is had between the parties.

In this case the applicant for the writ is in no fault. The omission of the clerk of the county court should not drive him from the Superior Court unheard. He has done all that is in his power (and he has done enough) to secure his adversary in the event of his being ultimately successful in the contest.

Let the bond be received, and the suit retained for trial.

NOTE. — See Fox v. Steele, ante, 48, and the cases referred to in the note.

Cited: Brittain v. Howell, 19 N.C. 108; McDowell v. Bradley, 30 N.C. 93.

(328)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSSEAU v. THORNBERRY
(Jan 1, 1816)