Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

OVERTON, ASSIGNEE OF ANDERSON, v. CRABB.

A plea which is a direct denial of what is stated in the declaration, though in affirmative words, should conclude to the country. (Acc. Calhoun v. Lillard, 4 Hay., 56.)

A party is entitled to amend his plea after demurrer, upon affidavit that his plea is true; and if he has been denied this below, he will be allowed it in the Court of Errors. (Acc. Calhoun v. Lillard, 4 Hay., 56; Henderson's Admr., v, King, 4 Kay., 97, 98.)

[Cited in: 1 Lea, 205.]

In Error. —

Per Curiam.

This was an action of covenant. The question is concerning the conclusion of a plea. The declaration stated that the defendant had not paid $640, the one-half of the price of lands sold, which by his covenant he was bound to pay. The defendant pleaded performance, and this he was ready to verify. Being a direct denial of what is stated in the declaration it should have concluded to the country. It is the matter and not the words that is to be considered, for the matter, which is negative to that in the declaration, is expressed in affirmative words. Still it is a denial, and should tender an issue by concluding to the county. The Circuit Court ought to have given leave to amend if the defendant could show that the plea is probable, so now that leave must be given if it can be satisfactorily shown that the plea is true, otherwise judgment to be entered for the plaintiff.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OVERTON, ASSIGNEE OF ANDERSON, v. CRABB
(Jun 1, 1817)