Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM SHEPPARD'S HEIRS v. STEPHANUS SHEPPARD. — TERM, 108.

A color of title, without seven years continued possession, will not entitle the plaintiff in ejectment to recover, even against an intruder.

DANIEL, J.

The ancestors of the lessors of the plaintiffs did not derive any title from the patentee, or from any person claiming under him. They claim by virtue of a deed made and executed to their ancestor by a certain B. Sheppard, dated in May, 1792. It is admitted by the case that neither their ancestor, in his lifetime, nor themselves since his death, have had a seven years continued possession of the premises in question; and we are therefore of opinion that the deed of 1792, accompanied with a possession short of seven years, did not ripen into such a title as authorizes the present lessors of the plaintiffs to recover in this action.

Judgment for defendant.

NOTE. — See Jones v. Ridley, ante, 280, and the note to Strudwick v. Shaw, 1 N.C. 34, and to the same case in 2 N.C. 5.

Cited: Duncan v. Duncan, 25 N.C. 318; Taylor v. Gooch, 48 N.C. 468; Gudger v. Hensley, 82 N.C. 483.

(547)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHEPPARD v. SHEPPARD
(Jan 1, 1817)