Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

DEN ON DEMISE OF SANDERS v. HYATT.

Devise to A., and if he dies without any lawful begotten heir of his body, then to his brothers and sisters. Held, that the devise to A. is of an estate tail which, by the act of 1784, is converted into a fee simple, and the ulterior limitation is therefore void.

HALL, J.

The clause in the will gives the land over if Lawrence should die without a lawfully begotten heir. Now he cannot die without heir as long as the persons live to whom the ulterior limitation gives it upon the happening of that event, for they may become heirs at law after the death of others more nearly related. The word heir, in the singular number, must therefore mean issue; and by that means the estate (248) first given in fee is turned into an estate tail, and by the act of 1784 is converted into a fee simple again in the first taker. The ulterior limitation is therefore void, and nothing passes by it.

By the Court, judgment

Affirmed.

Cited: Hollowell v. Kornegay, 29 N.C. 262; Weatherly v. Armfield, 36 N.C. 26; Buchanan v. Buchanan, 99 N.C. 311; Leathers v. Gray, 101 N.C. 164.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SANDERS v. HYATT
(Jun 1, 1821)