Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

GLADYS H. TAYLOR et al., complainants-appellants, v. HARRY C. ERRION etal., defendants-respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The decree under review is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Jayne, ubi supra. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, DONGES, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, JJ. 11.

For modification — McGEEHAN, J. 1.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAYLOR v. ERRION
(May 15, 1947)