Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

DANIEL AND JOSEPH JACKSON, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR vs. JOHN TWENTYMAN.

The 11th section of the act of 1789, must be construed in connexion with and in conformity with the constitution of the United States. By this latter, the judicial power does not extend to private suits in which an alien is a party, unless a citizen be the adverse party; and it is indispensable to aver the citizenship of the defendants, to show, on the record, the jurisdiction of the court.

THIS cause was brought before the Court by a writ of error to the circuit court of the southern circuit of New York.

The description of the parties on the record was "John Twentyman, a subject of the king of Great Britain vs. Daniel and Joseph Jackson." No citizenship of the defendants being argued.

The question was whether the circuit court under the 11th section of the judiciary act of 1789, ch. 20, which gives jurisdiction, among other cases, "where an alien is a party," had jurisdiction of the cause without an assumpsit on the record of the citizenship of the defendants.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JACKSON v. TWENTYMAN
(Jan 1, 1829)