Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. GEORGE M'DANIEL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

The declaration was for a balance of accounts of nine hundred and eighty-eight dollars and ninety-four cents, and the ad damnum was laid at two thousand dollars. The bill of exceptions showed that the United States claimed interest on the balance due them. Under those circumstances it is no objection to the jurisdiction, that the bill of exceptions was taken by the counsel for the United States to a refusal of the court to grant an instruction asked by the United States, which was applicable to certain items of credit only claimed by the defendants, which would reduce the debt below the sum of one thousand dollars. The court cannot judicially know what influence that refusal had upon the verdict.

ERROR to the circuit court of the United States for the county of Washington in the District of Columbia.

Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the court, overruling the motion.

The declaration is for a balance of accounts of nine hundred and eighty-eight dollars and ninety-four cents; and the ad damnum is laid at two thousand dollars. The bill of exceptions shows, that the United States claimed interest on the balance due to them. There is a general verdict for the defendant. Under these circumstances, it is no objection to the jurisdiction that the bill of exceptions was taken by the counsel for the United States to a refusal of the circuit court to grant an instruction asked by the United States, which was applicable to certain items of credit only, claimed by the defendant, which would reduce the debt below the sum of one thousand dollars. The court cannot judicially know what influence that refusal had upon the verdict.

The motion was overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. M'DANIEL
(Jan 1, 1832)