Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARY MITCHELL v. ESTHER MITCHELL ET AL.

A devise of "all my property of any nature or kind whatsoever, which deeds, papers, and movables will show," can be no intendment nor construction be taken to indicate an intention in the testator to devise the land which belonged to his wife.

DANIEL, J., after stating the case:

We are of opinion that the judge put a wrong construction on this clause in Richard Mitchell's will. The words "my property of any nature or kind whatsoever, which deeds, papers, and movables will show," by no intendment nor construction can be taken to indicate an intention in the testator to devise the land which belonged to his wife. This being our opinion, it becomes unnecessary to decide the other question raised in the cause, whether dower under the statute in trust or equitable estates could be recovered in any other way than bill in equity. The judgment must be reversed, and upon the case agreed, judgment given for the defendant.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

(259)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MITCHELL v. MITCHELL
(Dec 1, 1840)