HOLLIDAY ET AL. v. BATSON ET AL, U.S., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Barton having filed and read in open court a certificate in writing, in the following words and figures, to wit: — "Clerk's Office, Circuit Court, United States, 5th Circuit, and Eastern District of Louisiana. "ROBERT HOLLIDAY ET AL. v. JOSEPH N. BATSON ET AL. "In the above-entitled cause, I certify that a final judgment was rendered in the Circuit Court of the United States for the 9th (now 5th) Circuit and Eastern District of Louisiana, on the twentieth day of January, eighteen hundred and forty-one, and that a writ of error was taken by the defendants, returnable to the January term, 1842, of the Supreme Court of the United States. "Witness my hand, and the seal of said court, at New Orleans, this 4th February, 1845. [SEAL.] DUNCAN N. HENNEN, Clerk." and moved the court to docket and dismiss the said writ of error, under the forty-third rule of court. It is thereupon now here considered and ordered by the court, that the said motion be, and the same is, hereby overruled, the titling of the case in the said certificate being too vague and uncertain. Per Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Barton having filed and read in open court a certificate in writing, in the following words and figures, to wit: — "Clerk's Office, Circuit Court, United States, 5th Circuit, and Eastern District of Louisiana. "ROBERT HOLLIDAY ET AL. v. JOSEPH N. BATSON ET AL. "In the above-entitled cause, I certify that a final judgment was rendered in the Circuit Court of the United States for the 9th (now 5th) Circuit and Eastern District of Louisiana, on the twentieth day of January, eighteen hundred and forty-one, and that a writ of error was taken by the defendants, returnable to the January term, 1842, of the Supreme Court of the United States. "Witness my hand, and the seal of said court, at New Orleans, this 4th February, 1845. [SEAL.] DUNCAN N. HENNEN, Clerk." and moved the court to docket and dismiss the said writ of error, under the forty-third rule of court. It is thereupon now here considered and ordered by the court, that the said motion be, and the same is, hereby overruled, the titling of the case in the said certificate being too vague and uncertain. Per Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ROBERT HOLLIDAY ET AL. v. JOSEPH N. BATSON ET AL.

In order to entitle a party to have a case docketed and dismissed, under the forty-third rule of court, the certificate of the clerk of the court below must set forth an accurate titling of the case.

The above motion was made and overruled at the preceding term. At the present term, a certificate was filed, with a proper titling, and, on motion of Mr. Eustis, the case was docketed and dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

HOLLIDAY ET AL. v. BATSON ET AL

ROBERT HOLLIDAY ET AL. v. JOSEPH N. BATSON ET AL.

Comments