Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CATHERINE MURPHY, Respondent, v. MOLLIE LIFSCHITZ et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and DYE, JJ. THACHER, J., dissents and votes for modification of the judgment by reducing it to $234.71 upon the ground that there was no evidence that upon reasonable effort the goods sold could not have been procured at some price.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MURPHY v. LIFSCHITZ
(Jul 19, 1945)