Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FARNUM HARRIS et ux. v. IRA B. PECK.

A certificate of discharge under the Bankrupt law, unless impeached for fraud, is an absolute discharge of a preexisting debt, unless the debt is revived by a new promise.

Chief Justice GREENE delivered the charge of the court.

A certificate of discharge under the Bankrupt law, unless impeached for fraud, is an absolute discharge of a preexisting debt. But while the law considers the debtor discharged from all legal obligation, it still regards the moral obligation as a good consideration to support a new promise; in this case the plaintiff has offered evidence, that David Daniels promised to pay the note upon which that action was brought, and which was discharged under the Bankrupt law. The new promise, if proved, is as valid as the original note. You have only to consider whether or not the promise was made. To prove a new promise it is not necessary to be shown that the word promise was used. An agreement to pay, or any word signifying an intent to pay, or giving assurance that he would pay, is sufficient evidence of a new promise. It is contended by the defendant that no time was fixed when the payment was to be made. But that does not affect the force of the legal obligation. The law itself will fix the time.

Verdict for the plaintiff.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FARNUM HARRIS ET UX v. IRA B. PECK
(Sep 1, 1849)