Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSEPH H. DULLES, EDWARD WILCOX, AND JOHN WELSH, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. RICHARD S. JONES.

THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi.

In its main features it was similar to the preceding case of The Bank of the State of Alabama v. Dalton, and it will be perceived, by a reference to the concluding sentence of the opinion of the court in that case, that it included the present. No further report need, therefore, be made of it.

Order.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DULLES v. JONES
(Dec 1, 1849)