Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WARNER and others against LEE, president, c.

JOHNSON, J. delivered the opinion of the court.

When the defendant received this note he had notice, from its indorsement, from the course of business of Smith Co., with which he was acquainted, and from the letter which enclosed the note to him, that it was placed in their hands for collection only, on account of the owners, the plaintiffs in this suit. Under these circumstances, if he had made advances upon account of it, he could not have held the note nor its proceeds against the plaintiffs. ( Clark v. Merchants' Bank, 2 Comst. 380.) Of course in this case, where he had made no advances on the faith of the note, he cannot acquire a title to it by bringing it into account with Smith Co., after its payment, and calling the transaction a discount. The judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WARNER v. LEE
(Apr 1, 1852)