Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

NATHANIEL C. DANA v. ROBERT G. LEWIS.

The word "crops," in a will, will pass crops growing on a farm at the death of the testator, where there are other words in the will by which the gathered crops would pass.

BRAYTON, J. delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question in this case is, whether the word crops, in the bequest to Amasa Whipple, means growing crops or gathered crops. If it means the former, the execution was rightly served by the defendant. It is a rule of construction, that effect should be given to all the words of a written instrument, if that be possible. We think the gathered crops would have passed to Amasa Whipple by the words "hay, fodder, produce and provisions;" and, therefore, as the word "crops" may mean either gathered or growing crops, in order to give effect to it, we must construe it in the latter sense.

Judgment for the defendant.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DANA v. LEWIS
(Sep 1, 1853)