Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOHN S. HARRIS v. MARY HARRIS et al.

In appealing from a decree of a Court of Probate appointing or refusing to appoint a guardian for several persons, the appellant may appeal from the decree as far as relates to one or more or such persons without appealing from the entire decree, but, in such case, if the decree is rendered upon separate applications in behalf of each person embraced in it, a separate appeal and bond must be filed in reference to each person intended to be embraced in the appeal.

The court were of the opinion that petitions by or on behalf of two or more, might be embraced in a single application to the Probate Court for the appointment of a guardian, and that the judgments of the court upon these several petitions, and also upon a separate application made in connection with them for the appointment of the same guardian, like the two applications in the present case, might be embraced in a single decree, and that in appealing from such a decree the appellant might confine his appeal to so much of the decree as related to one or more of the petitioners without appealing from the entire decree, but that, where the appeal was from the decision of the court upon two distinct applications, a separate appeal must be taken and a separate appeal bond filed in reference to each. Whether in case of an appeal from a decision in reference to two persons whose petitions were embraced in one application, a separate appeal and bond was required as to each person, the court did not decide though they intimated that such was their opinion.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HARRIS v. HARRIS ET AL
(Sep 1, 1853)