Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

D. CUTHBERTSON, et. al. v. HENRY LONG, Executor.

Where J.L. agreed to make good to the plaintiff, certain sums, which they had paid as sureties for his son, out of that part of his estate which his said son would be entitled to at his (J.L's) death, and covenanted, by deed, to pay such claims as said sureties could produce on or before the death of J.L., in a suit brought against the executor of J.L., it was Held that it was not necessary to show that the sureties had exhibited their claims to J.L. in his life-time.

NASH, C.J.

The action is brought on a conditional bond. The condition is as follows: "The conditions of the above obligation is such, that David Simpson and David Cuthbertson, have paid money for John Long, as securities on several bonds and sundry executions; we, John Long and Jacob long, are held and firmly bound to the said D. Simpson and D. Cuthbertson, to pay all the just claims, receipts or executions, that they can produce, on or before the death of Jacob Long, to be paid out of John Long's distributive share of his father's estate. Signed, "John Long," "Jacob Long," each with a seal attached. The case states that the plaintiffs had paid as sureties, before the death of Jacob Long, the sum of $278.58.

The only question which is presented to us is, as to the proper construction of that portion of the condition which relates to the production of their just claims, receipts and executions, on or before the death of Jacob Long, the father of John Long, of whom the defendant, Henry Long, is the executor. From a part of the case, it appears that the defence below was rested on the fact, that these evidences of debt, were not produced to Jacob Long before his death.

His Honor instructed the jury, that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover from the defendant all sums of money which they had paid for John Long, as his sureties, before the death of Jacob Long. In this construction of the obligation, we entirely concur. There is nothing in the instrument, showing that these evidences of payment were to be produced to Jacob Long during his life. The true meaning was, that Jacob Long was to repay to the plaintiffs all such money as they should pay for his son John, during his (Jacob's) life. He was not willing to bind himself for payments made after his death.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CUTHBERTSON v. LONG
(Jun 1, 1857)