Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

A. W. SPRAGUE v. THE HARTFORD, PROVIDENCE, FISHKILL RAILROAD COMPANY.

A corporation exclusively owing its corporate existence to the legislation or sovereign act of another state or country can alone be proceeded against. in the first instance, for debt. by attachment of its property, under ch. 182, § 1, of Rev. Stats.: and therefore, the H P. F.R.R. Co., originally consisting of two corporations, respectively established by the states of Connecticut and Rhode Island, which were afterwards united and established as one corporation, with one capital stock, and one set of stockholders and officers, both by Rhode Island and Connecticut, is not suable in Rhode Island by attachment of its property, but by writ of summons only, served either in the mode directed by ch. 179, § 7, of the Rev. Stats. or in the mode directed by the 14th section of its Rhode Island charter.

AMES, C.J.

The defendants are not less a domestic corporation and established as such by this state, because they are also established as a domestic corporation by the state of Connecticut. It is only a foreign corporation, that is, one exclusively owing its corporate existence to the legislation or sovereign act of another state or country, which can be proceeded against, in the first instance, for debt, by attachment of its property, under ch. 182, § 1, of the Revised Statutes. All other corporations are suable here only by writs of summons, served, either in the mode directed by ch. 179, § 7, of the Revised Statutes, or in the mode, if there be any, directed by their respective acts of incorporation. The service of this writ however, though void as a service of it by attachment, is good as a service of it by summons; the writ having been served, as appears by the return of the officer, by leaving an attested copy of it with E.M. Brigham, the secretary and treasurer or agent of the corporation; which is a good service of the writ under the 14th section of its Rhode Island charter, made part of the plea.

Upon the ruling that the service was void as an attachment, it was then agreed, that the plea should be sustained; the plaintiffs to have leave, without costs, to amend their writ and declaration, and the officer, if necessary, his return, so as to conform the same to the fact, and to the proper form and service of a writ of summons merely; the defendants to answer to the merits.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPRAGUE v. THE HARTFORD ETC. RAILROAD COMPANY
(Mar 1, 1858)