Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

A. J. FALLS and ROBERT TORRENCE Executors, etc., v. DAVID McCULLOCH and others.

A legacy of property, "to be sold at my wife's death and equally divided among all my children," is vested; and therefore the representatives of such children as survived the testator and died before the wife are entitled to shares.

The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court.

READE, J.

The clause of the will upon which the advice of the court is asked is as follows:

"The balance of my property I allow to be sold and my just debts paid. The negroes are to be sold at my wife's death and equally divided among all my children."

Some of the children died after the testator and in the lifetime of the tenant for life. The question is, was the remainder vested, so that the representatives of the deceased children take.

It is a vested remainder, and the representatives of the deceased children do take.

The doctrine governing this case is settled in Conly v. Kincade, 60 N.C. 594.

PER CURIAM. Decree accordingly.

(141)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FALLS v. McCULLOCH
(Jan 1, 1867)