Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

RUSSELL H. KINGSBURY v. E. B. LYON AND OTHERS.

In ordinary dealings during the late war, without design to aid the rebellion, Confederate treasury notes were a sufficient consideration to support a contract.

The suit was brought upon a bond for $1,000.00 executed by the defendants to the plaintiff, March 3d 1863, upon a loan of Confederate treasury notes by the plaintiff to the defendant, Lyon. The pleas were, General Issue, Illegal consideration.

If the Court were of opinion with the plaintiff, judgment was to be rendered for him, for $488.38, of which, etc., otherwise, judgment was to — be for the defendants.

His Honor gave judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.

READE, J.

In the case of Phillips v. Hooker, 62 N.C. 193, it was decided, upon full argument and much consideration, that Confederate Treasury notes were a sufficient consideration to support a contract, when such notes were used in ordinary dealings, without intent to aid the Rebellion. That case has been frequently cited with approbation; so that the question is settled.

The judgment below is reversed, and judgment here for plaintiff upon the case agreed.

Per curiam.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KINGSBURY v. LYON
(Jan 1, 1870)