Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE STATE v. DANIEL R. McINTOSH.

Upon the trial of issues in proceedings for bastardy the defendant is a competent witness.

Upon the trial of the issues, the defendant tendered himself as a witness, but his Honor excluded him, as incompetent. The defendant excepted.

Verdict, Guilty; Judgment accordingly, and Appeal by the defendant.

DICK, J.

A proceeding in bastardy, is a civil action, as distinguished from a criminal action: Const. Art. IV, § 1.

Under the Code of Civil Procedure, it is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a civil action proper. In such special proceeding a party may be examined as a witness in his own behalf: C.C.P. §§ 342-3; State v. Waldrop, 63 N.C. 507; State v. Pate, 44 N.C. 244.

There was error in the ruling of his Honor, and there must be a venire de novo upon the issue submitted.

Let this be certified.

Per curiam.

Venire de novo.

Cited: S. v. Hickerson, 72 N.C. 422; S. v. Crouse, 86 N.C. 619; S. v. Ballard, 122 N.C. 1028; S. v. Liles, 134 N.C. 737.

(608)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. McINTOSH
(Jun 1, 1870)