Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

H. C. WALL AND OTHERS v. HENRY FAIRLEY AND OTHERS.

The presiding Judge, on a trial in the Court below, has the power in his discretion to allow or refuse amendments to the pleadings.

The amendment asked, consisted in substituting an amended complaint in lieu of the original, which the counsel represented to his Honor had been filed under a misapprehension of the facts of the case; the true state of which had come to light since the original was filed.

The Court allowed the amendment, from which order, defendants appealed.

READE, J.

The power of the Court below to allow the amendment, is the only question. And about that there is no doubt. The case of Robinson v. Willoughby, 67 N.C. 84, is decidedly in point in favor of the power.

There is no error. This will be certified.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALL v. FAIRLEY
(Jan 1, 1874)