AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. THE CITY OF WILMINGTON.

Section 10, Chap. 5, Private laws of 1868-69, which authorizes the Mayor and Aldermen of the city of Wilmington, from time to time, to assess the value of property within the city for taxation by the city, is unconstitutional. (Const. Art. 5, Sec. 3.)

NOTE. — The 10th section of the Charter of Wilmington, reads:
SECTION 10. That the Mayor and Aldermen may cause an assessment of the real estate of the city at such times and times, and in such manner as they may deem expedient, and shall have power to tax all subjects of taxation, which are now liable to be taxed either by State or county under existing laws, or any laws that may be hereafter enacted; and if any person shall render an account of their personal property liable to taxation, which, in the judgment of the Mayor and Aldermen, is below the value, it shall be the duty of said Mayor Aldermen to appoint three freeholders to assess and value the same, according to the true cash value of said property, and levy the tax according to said valuation, so made by said freeholders.

ARTICLE VII, SEC. 9, of the Constitution, clearly implies that the valuation upon which city taxes are to be uniformly levied, is to be, that assessed by the Township Trustees.

RODMAN, J.

The question is, whether a clause in the charter of the city of Wilmington, (Private Act 1868-'69, chap. 6, sec. 10,) which authorizes the Mayor and Aldermen of that city, from time to time, to assess the value of property within the city, for taxation by the city, is constitutional? We are of opinion that it is not. The Constitution, Art. V. sec. 3, provides that all property shall be taxed by an uniform rule. It is true that the Constitution is here especially providing for, and speaking in reference to, taxation by the State and counties, but the language is general enough to cover taxation by every municipal corporation having a power to tax. Art. VII, entitled "municipal corporations," after providing by sec. 6, that the Township Trustees should assess the taxable property of their townships, proceeds, in sec. 9, to enact, that all taxes levied by any county, city, town, or township shall be uniform and ad valorem upon all property, c. This section, being placed where it is, clearly implies that the valuation upon which city taxes are to be uniformly levied, is to be that assessed by the Township Trustees.

Taxation cannot be "by an uniform rule" if each municipal corporation can assess the property liable to it at a different value. Every city must be either a township or part of one, and there can be no reason why the valuation of the Township Trustees should not suffice for city taxation, as it does for taxation by the State, county, and township. Valuations, by distinct authorities, are an unnecessary expense and annoyance to the citizen. The more general in its application a law can be made, the more likely it is to be understood, remembered and obeyed. Special regulations, applying only within certain limited localities, serve only to perplex all but professional experts, and continues to oppress the ignorant.

The Mayor and Aldermen of Wilmington must be governed in their levy of city taxes, by the valuation of the Township Trustees.

PER CURIAM. Judgment below reversed, and judgment for the plaintiff according to the case agreed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILWAY CO. v. CITY OF WILMINGTON
(Jan 1, 1875)