Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

TOWN OF GENOA v. WOODRUFF ET AL.

1. The judgment in this case was affirmed upon the authority of Town of Venice v. Murdock, supra, p. 494. 2. The holder of a coupon is entitled to recover interest thereon from the time it fell due.

ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

MR. JUSTICE STRONG delivered the opinion of the court.

Twenty-six errors have been assigned in this case, not one of which can be sustained. All which have the least plausibility have been considered and declared unfounded in Town of Venice v. Murdock, supra, p. 494; and the others might well be dismissed without special notice. The thirteenth complains that the circuit judge decided that the plaintiffs could recover interest upon the coupons from the time they fell due. That the ruling was correct is perfectly plain. It was in entire accordance with the decisions generally of the State courts and also of this court.

The other assignments have either been answered in Town of Venice v. Murdock, or they are totally without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MILLER, MR. JUSTICE DAVIS, and MR. JUSTICE FIELD, dissented.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOWN OF GENOA v. WOODRUFF ET AL
(Oct 1, 1875)