Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

SARGENT v. PUTNAM

An action at law may be committed, without the consent of the parties, to one or more referees for the settlement of accounts too complicated to be intelligently investigated and adjusted in a jury trial.

DOE, C. J.

Section 2 of chapter 35, Laws of 1876, authorizes the court to commit to one or more referees any cause at law or equity, or the determination of any question of fact "wherein the parties are not, as matter of right, entitled to a trial by jury." "As matter of right" here means as matter of constitutional right. And, by the constitution, neither party is entitled to a jury trial for the settlement of accounts too complicated to be intelligently investigated and adjusted in that way. Copp v. Henniker, 55 N.H. 179, 210, 211; Perkins v. Scott, 57 N.H. 55, 81, 82, 83, 84; Bellows v. Bellows, ante, p. 60.

Exception overruled.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SARGENT v. PUTNAM
(Aug 1, 1877)