Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY.

The cost of obtaining and prosecuting an indictment, upon Gen. St., c. 264, s. 14, against a railroad for causing the death of a person, is to be borne by the complainant, and is not a charge upon the county.

ALLEN, J.

This proceeding, though criminal in form, is, in some respects and for some material purposes, a civil suit. In its method of institution, the form of the complaint, and, perhaps, in other respects, it is criminal. In some respects it is criminal, in others civil. State v. Manchester Lawrence R. R., 52 N.H. 528, 560; State v. Railway, 58 Me. 176. The object of the law authorizing the proceeding is not the punishment of a crime, but the compensation of the widow and children, or heirs, of the person whose life is lost through the negligence of the defendants. No part of the fine recovered is paid to the county, and the county has no interest in the suit. In such cases, it is reasonable that the expenses, including the witness fees, should be advanced by those for whose benefit the proceeding is instituted and carried on.

Case discharged.

Doe, C. J., did not sit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY
(Aug 1, 1877)