Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HUSSEY v. DAVIS.

A search-warrant, issued under Gen. St., c. 237, must require the officer to make return of his proceedings thereon, with an inventory.

DOE, C. J.

No search-warrant can be lawfully issued but in cases and with the formalities prescribed by law. Bill of Rights, art. 19. The common law of search-warrants, affirmed in the Bill of Rights, is of extraordinary strictness. Cooley Const. Lim. 303; Cooley on Torts 295. The "warrant shall require the officer" "to make return of his proceedings thereon, with an inventory of such things sought as shall there be found, and of such things as, being liable to seizure, have been taken by him, and are in custody." Gen. St., c. 237, s. 3. In this case, as the warrant did not require the officer to make return of his proceedings or of an inventory, it is erroneous, and affords no justification to the defendant. Guenther v. Day, 6 Gray 490. He made return of his proceedings with the prescribed inventory: but the defect in the warrant was not cured by his doing what a valid warrant would have required him to do.

Case discharged.

FOSTER, J., did not sit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUSSEY v. DAVIS
(Jun 1, 1878)