Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HILLIARD v. NOYES a.

The payment and acceptance of a sum less than the amount due on an unliquidated claim, in discharge of the whole claim, is a liquidation and payment of it.

SMITH, J.

When a creditor relinquishes the residue of his claim upon being paid a part thereof, there must be some consideration for the relinquishment, or something to show the possibility of a benefit to the creditor; otherwise the agreement is only nudum pactum. Fitch v. Sutton, 5 East 230. But this rule is confined to a case of debt, or to a claim for a liquidated amount — Donohue v. Woodbury, 6 Cush. 148, 150; and not to an agreement made in compromise of a doubtful claim on sufficient consideration — Tuttle v. Tuttle, 12 Met. 551; nor where the claim is for unliquidated damages — 2 Greenl. Ev., s. 28; Wilkinson v. Byers, 1 A. E. 106. It was necessary that the parties should understand that the sum paid was in full, and the instructions given must have been so understood by the jury.

Exceptions overruled.

STANLEY and BINGHAM, JJ., did not sit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILLIARD v. NOYES
(Jun 1, 1878)