Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM WILSON, Respondent, v. JUSTUS PALMER, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

Per Curiam.

The only judgment entered in this action after the decision of the General Term was entered August 3, 1877, and notice thereof was given on the same day. That was a judgment of affirmance and for $96.99 costs. The notice of appeal and the undertaking describe that judgment, and no other. No other judgment was ever entered, and it does not appear that that judgment was ever canceled, or actually modified. It is true that the taxation of costs was corrected, by order of August 30, 1877, granted on motion for re-taxation by striking out the small sum of $1.25. The undertaking on appeal was not filed or served until August 30, 1878. As the appeal was confessedly not perfected within one year from August third, it was too late. No other notice to limit the time of the appeal was needful. There is but one appeal, and that is from the judgment entered August third, and that must be dismissed, with costs.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILSON v. PALMER
(Nov 26, 1878)