Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WARNER BANK v. CLEMENT Co.

Whether an action should be brought forward and the judgment vacated is a question of fact to be decided at the trial term.

STANLEY, J.

There is no doubt of the power of the court in any case, for sufficient cause, to bring forward an action and vacate the judgment rendered therein. Bellows v. Stone, 14 N.H. 175; Frink v. Frink, 43 N.H. 508; Hillsborough v. Nichols, 46 N.H. 379; Judge of Probate v. Webster, 46 N.H. 518; Stickney v. Davis, 17 Pick. 170; McClew v. Burt, 5 Met. 200.

What is sufficient cause is a question of fact, depending upon the particular circumstances of each case. These should be established by evidence at the trial term.

Case discharged.

FOSTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANK v. CLEMENT
(Mar 1, 1879)