Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

BANK v. RIDER a.

An endorsee of a note, having knowledge of such facts as should put him on inquiry as to the validity of the endorsement, is charged with a knowledge of what he would have learned by such inquiry.

STANLEY, J.

The instructions requested were properly refused They lacked an essential qualification. If the plaintiffs had reason able cause to believe that N. did not assent to the endorsement, or if the circumstances at the time they took the note were such as to put them on inquiry whether N. assented to the endorsement, they were bound to inquire, and would be charged with knowledge of all they would have learned on such inquiry. Warren v. Swett, 31 N.H. 332; Dow v. Sayward, 14 N.H. 9. The instructions given were correct. Wagner v. Freschl, 56 N.H. 495.

Judgment on the verdict.

SMITH, J., did not sit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANK v. RIDER
(Mar 1, 1879)