Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE v. PETER LEITCH. The judge who presided on the trial of this case (after hearing an appeal was taken) informs the Reporter, by letter, that no bond or affida

Appeal — Practice.

Where, on an appeal in a capital case, there is no statement of the case, and no error appears on the record, it will be certified to the court below that there is no error, so that it may proceed to judgment.

( State v. Ray, 10 Ired., 29; State v. Langford, Busb., 436; State v. Murray, 80 N.C. 364, cited and approved.)

Judgment was pronounced upon conviction of the prisoner, and he appealed to this court.

DILLARD, J.

This was an indictment for murder, and on the appeal of the prisoner to this court, there being no statement of the case, it is our duty to look through the record to see if there be any error therein.

We have carefully examined the whole record and are unable to detect any error entitling the prisoner to a new trial or arrest of judgment, and in such case we can only have certified our opinion to the court below that the court may proceed to judgment. State v. Ray, 10 Ired., 29; State v. Langford, Busb., 436; State v. Murray, 80 N.C. 364.

There is no error and this will be certified to the court below that the sentence of the law may be pronounced and executed.

PER CURIAM. No error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. LEITCH
(Jan 1, 1880)