Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE v. MILES HINSON.

Appeal — Practice.

No appeal lies from an interlocutory order in a criminal action.

( State v. Bailey, 65 N.C. 426; State v. Wiseman, 68 N.C. 203; State v. Keeter, 80 N.C. 472, cited and approved.)

The indictment is drawn under the act of 1879, ch. 127, for carrying a concealed weapon. The state proved that the defendant was seen on the track of the Carolina Central railroad pointing a pistol at a train leaving Lilesville, and that he discharged the same. Defendant objected, for that, there was no evidence of concealment, exception overruled, verdict of guilty, (but no final judgment pronounced thereon) and the defendant appealed.

SMITH, C. J.

The defendant is indicted for carrying concealed about his person a pistol in violation of the act of March 5th, 1879, and on the trial was found guilty. On inspecting the record it appears that no final judgment has been rendered, and therefore as has been repeatedly held no appeal lies. It is only in civil causes that appeals from interlocutory orders are allowed. State v. Bailey, 65 N.C. 426; State v. Wiseman, 68 N.C. 203; State v. Keeter, 80 N.C. 472. The appeal must therefore be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

PER CURIAM Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HINSON
(Jan 1, 1880)