Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

SMITH v. CUSHMAN.

The question, whether a defect of proof in evidence addressed to the court can be supplied after verdict by newly discovered evidence, will not ordinarily be considered on a motion for a rehearing: it is a question to be decided at the trial term.

CLARK, J.

the court is of opinion that the motion for a rehearing should be denied. At the trial term, if it appears that the newly discovered evidence raises nothing for the consideration of the jury, but a mere question for the court, by which the former trial could not be affected in a manner unjust to the defendant, the presiding judge will determine whether justice requires a new trial of this point only by the court, and make such order as justice requires. No question of mere law is now presented which we can see must necessarily be tried by the court, and the question raised is sent to the trial term. Gamsby v. Columbia, 58 N.H. 60.

Motion for rehearing denied.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. CUSHMAN
(Jun 1, 1880)