Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. EPHRAIM WOODFIN.

Concealed Weapon.

If one carry a pistol off his own premises, concealed about his person, for the purpose of hunting, he is guilty of a violation of the statute.

ASHE, J.

The facts of the case are not set forth in the statement made up by his Honor, and we are left to infer what they were from the special instructions asked by the defendant, and the charge to the jury.

From these we infer the defendant went hunting with a pistol in his pocket, or concealed about his person. If so he was clearly guilty of a violation of the statute.

(527) There is no error in the refusal of the court to give the instructions asked; and while we think he laid down the law somewhat too broadly in his charge to the jury, yet so far as it applied to the supposed facts of the case, it was not erroneous.

No error. Affirmed.

Cited: S. v. Erwin, 91 N.C. 549; S. v. Dixon, 114 N.C. 852; S. v. Simmons, 143 N.C. 617; S. v. Woodlief, 172 N.C. 888; S. v. Mangum 187 N.C. 479.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WOODFIN
(Oct 1, 1882)