Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • A. S. Twitchell, for the plaintiff, cited Cleghorn v. N. Y. c. R. Co., 56 N.Y. 41; Robinson v. Webb, 11 Bush 464; Johnson v. Bruner, 61 Pa. St. 58; Pickens v. Diecker, 21 Ohio St. 212; Smith v. Webster, 23 Mich. 298; Hays v. Millar, 77 Pa. St. 238; Southwick v. Estes, 7 Cush. 385; Levi v. Brooks, 121 Mass. 501; P. c. R. Co. v. Derby, 14 How. 468; Snyder v. H.c. R. Co., 60 Mo. 413; McGlothlin v. Madden, 16 Kan. 466; Cosgrove v. Ogden, 49 N.Y. 255; Peck v. N. Y. c. R. Co., 8 Hun 286; Garretzen v. Duenckel, 50 Mo. 104; Ewbank v. Nutting, 7 C. B. 797; Althorf v. Wolfe, 22 N. Y. 355; Randleson v. Murray, 8 A. E. 109; Rapson v. Cubitt, 9 M. W. 710; Booth v. Mister, 7 C. P. 66. Bingham Aldrich, for the plaintiff, cited Redding v. S.C. R. Co., 3 S.C. 1; Higgins v. T. Co., 46 N. Y; 23, 27; Duggins v. Watson, 15 Ark. 118; Armstrong v. Cooley, 10 Ill. 509; Simons v. Monier, 29 Barb. 419; Sleath v. Wilson, 9 C. P. 607; M'Kenzie v. M'Leod, 10 Bing. 385; Whatman v. Pearson, L. R. 3 C. P. 422. Ladd Fletcher, for the defendant, cited Wilson v. Peverly, 2 N.H. 548; M'Manus v. Crickett, 1 East 106; Lamb v. Palk, 9 C. P. 629; Mitchell v. Crassweller, 13 C. B. 237; Shearm. Red. Neg., ss. 63-65; Whatman v. Pearson, L. R. 3 C. P. 422; Bolingbroke v. Swindon, L. R. 9 C. P. 575; Gordon v. Rolt, 4 Exch. 365; Church v. Mansfield, 20 Conn. 284; M'Kenzie v. M'Leod, 10 Bing. 385; Limpus v. Omnibus Co., 1 H. C. 526; Whar. Neg., s. 171.
Judges
  • DOE, C. J.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • A. S. Twitchell, for the plaintiff, cited Cleghorn v. N. Y. c. R. Co., 56 N.Y. 41; Robinson v. Webb, 11 Bush 464; Johnson v. Bruner, 61 Pa. St. 58; Pickens v. Diecker, 21 Ohio St. 212; Smith v. Webster, 23 Mich. 298; Hays v. Millar, 77 Pa. St. 238; Southwick v. Estes, 7 Cush. 385; Levi v. Brooks, 121 Mass. 501; P. c. R. Co. v. Derby, 14 How. 468; Snyder v. H.c. R. Co., 60 Mo. 413; McGlothlin v. Madden, 16 Kan. 466; Cosgrove v. Ogden, 49 N.Y. 255; Peck v. N. Y. c. R. Co., 8 Hun 286; Garretzen v. Duenckel, 50 Mo. 104; Ewbank v. Nutting, 7 C. B. 797; Althorf v. Wolfe, 22 N. Y. 355; Randleson v. Murray, 8 A. E. 109; Rapson v. Cubitt, 9 M. W. 710; Booth v. Mister, 7 C. P. 66. Bingham Aldrich, for the plaintiff, cited Redding v. S.C. R. Co., 3 S.C. 1; Higgins v. T. Co., 46 N. Y; 23, 27; Duggins v. Watson, 15 Ark. 118; Armstrong v. Cooley, 10 Ill. 509; Simons v. Monier, 29 Barb. 419; Sleath v. Wilson, 9 C. P. 607; M'Kenzie v. M'Leod, 10 Bing. 385; Whatman v. Pearson, L. R. 3 C. P. 422. Ladd Fletcher, for the defendant, cited Wilson v. Peverly, 2 N.H. 548; M'Manus v. Crickett, 1 East 106; Lamb v. Palk, 9 C. P. 629; Mitchell v. Crassweller, 13 C. B. 237; Shearm. Red. Neg., ss. 63-65; Whatman v. Pearson, L. R. 3 C. P. 422; Bolingbroke v. Swindon, L. R. 9 C. P. 575; Gordon v. Rolt, 4 Exch. 365; Church v. Mansfield, 20 Conn. 284; M'Kenzie v. M'Leod, 10 Bing. 385; Limpus v. Omnibus Co., 1 H. C. 526; Whar. Neg., s. 171.
Judges
  • DOE, C. J.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

ANDREWS v. GREEN.

An employer is not liable for an act of his servant done in violation of orders, beyond the scopes of his employment, and without fault on the part of the employer.

DOE, C. J.

The act of setting the fire was not within the scope of the workman's employment, and was not the defendant's act. Wilson v. Peverly, 2 N.H. 548.

Judgment for the defendant.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

ANDREWS v. GREEN
(Dec 1, 1882)