Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

SARAH NEALE'S ADMINISTRATORS v. HADDOCK.

Slaves, to whom the wife has a right in remainder, do not vest in the husband so as to entitle his executor to claim them, in the event of his dying during the coverture before they come into possession, but they survive to the wife.

TAYLOR, J.

It is perfectly well settled that the husband is not entitled to the remainder of a chattel belonging to the wife at the time of the intermarriage. (186)

Verdict for plaintiff.

Quere de hoc.

NOTE. — See the note to Lewis v. Hines, 2 N.C. 278, and, in addition to the cases there cited, see Johnston v. Pasteur, 1 N.C. 582; Norfleet v. Harris, ibid., 517; Walker v. Mebane, 5 N.C. 41; Knight v. Leak, 19 N.C. 133; Revel v. Revel, 19 N.C. 272; Hardie v. Cotton, 36 N.C. 61; Poindexter v. Blackburn, ibid., 286.

Cited: Weeks v. Weeks, 40 N.C. 120 (but under erroneous title of Blount v. Haddock).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEALE v. HADDOCK
(Jan 1, 1802)