Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. BUCK.

One who causes a witness in attendance before a referee under a rule of court to be arrested upon civil process may be punished by the court for contempt.

CARPENTER, J.

The parties to an action, and their witnesses while in attendance upon the trial, and while going to or returning from the place of trial, are not liable to arrest. The privilege is not established for their benefit, but to protect the administration of justice. Without the free and unrestricted attendance of parties and witnesses, justice cannot be administered. Ex parte Cobbett, 7 E. B. 958; Newton v. Constable, 2 Q. B. 166. Persons who procure their arrest, or do anything else to obstruct the proceedings of a court, are guilty of contempt. Cole v. Hawkins, 2 Str. 1094; Garibaldo v. Cagnoni, 6 Mod. 90; Ex parte King, 7 Ves. 312; Littler v. Thomson, 2 Beav. 129; Bac. Abr., Priv. B., 2; 1 Tidd Pr. (3d Am. ed) 196-198; Regina v. Onslow, 12 Cox C. C. 358; Regina v. Skipworth, 12 Cox C. C. 371; Tenney's Case, 23 N.H. 162; Sturoc's Case, 48 N.H. 428; May v. Shumway, 16 Gray 86; Thompson's Case, 122 Mass. 428; In re Healey, 53 Vt. 694; Smith v. Jones, 76 Me. 138.

Exceptions overruled.

SMITH, J., did not sit; the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BUCK
(Jun 1, 1883)