Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILCOX v. KENDALL.

A clause in a deed reserving the right to take from a cistern in the house on the granted premises "all the water which the grantee, his heirs or assigns, shall not use," means only so much of the water as may not be used by the occupants in a reasonable enjoyment of the premises conveyed.

BLODGETT, J.

The plaintiff's title being derived from Cole, if he has the right to take water from the defendant's cistern (a point on which no opinion is expressed), it can, at most be no greater than that reserved to Cole in his prior conveyance to Sabin, which in legal contemplation was only so much of the water as might not be used by the occupants of the place conveyed in the reasonable enjoyment of the premises. Hence the finding of fact by the referee, that the defendant's use of the water has been a reasonable one, makes it obvious that the plaintiff's alleged cause of complaint is unfounded. Furthermore, it is not found, nor does it appear, that the quantity of water used or appropriated by the defendant has been increased since the plaintiff's ownership of the store lot, and therefore the changes in the manner of its use are immaterial.

Bill dismissed.

CARPENTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILCOX v. KENDALL
(Dec 1, 1885)