Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

W. A. EARLES, ET ALS., APPELLANTS, v. THOMAS H. GILHAM, RESPONDENT.

By the Court, HAWLEY, J.:

The order of the district court, allowing an amendment to appellants' motion for a new trial, having been reversed and set aside, upon an appeal taken therefrom by defendant Gilham, ( Earles v. Gilham, ante,) it follows from that decision that there is no statement, on motion for a new trial herein, which can be considered by this court; and, as it is not claimed that there is any error in the judgment roll, the judgment and order of the district court denying a new trial must be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Leonard, C. J. did not participate in this decision.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EARLES v. GILHAM
(Jul 1, 1887)