Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WALKER v. PENNSYLVANIA

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

The questions presented in this case do not differ, in any material respect, from those determined in POWELL v. PENNSYLVANIA, just decided. The principles announced in that case necessarily require an affirmance of the judgment below.

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD dissented.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALKER v. PENNSYLVANIA
(Apr 9, 1888)