Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

NATIONAL NIANTIC BANK vs. THE ADAMS EXPRESS COMPANY.

A plea in abatement on account of the nonjoinder of joint promisors need not be verified by affidavit. The statute 4 Anne, cap. 16, § 11, has not been adopted in this State.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action of assumpsit to which the defendants have pleaded in abatement the nonjoinder of other joint promisors. The plea is not accompanied by any affidavit to its truth. The plaintiff moves that it be stricken out for want of such an affidavit. We think the motion must be denied. The plea is not of the kind which requires an affidavit at common law, and the English practice requiring affidavits generally to pleas in abatement which depends on 4 Anne, cap. 16, § 11, has never, to our knowledge, prevailed in this State. The Statute 4 Anne, cap. 16, § 11, is not among the statutes declared to be in force by the act of A.D. 1749. We have no statute nor rule of court requiring an affidavit as some other states have.

Motion dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NAT. NIANTIC BANK v. ADAMS EXPRESS CO
(Oct 4, 1888)