Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

IN RE CROSS'S COMMISSION.

Under Pub. Stat. R.I. cap. 74, as amended by Pub. Laws R.I. cap. 819, of July 23, 1889, a guardian cannot retain his ward in an insane hospital after a commission has found the ward not to be of unsound mind.

The justice who appointed the commission submitted the guardian's request to the court, and, after conference with the other justices, addressed, the following letter to the attorneys of the guardian:

PROVIDENCE, September 3, 1889.

Messrs. Van Slyck Van Slyck:

GENTLEMEN, — The court is of opinion that chapter 74 of Public Statutes, as amended by the act of July, 1889, does not authorize a guardian to restrain his ward in an insane hospital, in case he shall be found by the commission not to be insane. Sections 11 and 12 of chapter 74 are not expressly repealed, and these authorize the detention upon the certificate of physicians only. These may stand until the finding of a commission. But after adjudication that the ward is not insane, we think the certificate of the physicians is annulled. By section 11, the authority of the guardian is not enough without the certificate. If, then, this is taken away, the authority of the guardian to restrain his ward in an insane hospital is also taken away.

In view of this conclusion we think the examination must go on. I have given an order to this effect to the commissioners.

Yours truly, JOHN H. STINESS.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE CROSS'S COMMISSION
(Sep 3, 1889)