Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

STATE v. E. D. WILLIS.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion in this case, delivered at the last term ( 104 N.C. 764), clearly indicates that the Court held that the area in question was not a natural oyster bed, and that on the special verdict the defendant was guilty. In entering the judgment, however, we inadvertently said that his Honor committed no error, whereas the judgment should have been, he erred in holding that the defendant was not guilty. For the reasons given in Cook v. Moore, 100 N.C. 294, the motion of the Attorney-General to correct the judgment in the particular mentioned, must be allowed. To that end the clerk will certify this opinion, as heretofore delivered, with the amendment, to the Superior Court, and direct the clerk of the latter court to return to the office of the clerk of this Court the certificate purporting to be the certificate of the judgment of this Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WILLIS
(Feb 1, 1890)