Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

W. J. WYATT v. LYNCHBURG AND DURHAM RAILROAD COMPANY.

Appeal — Transcript.

When the record on appeal does not set forth the pleadings, nor an agreed state of facts in lieu thereof, the cause will be remanded.

CLARK, J.

The transcript shows process, a reference to arbitration, an award, exception thereto, the action of the court below thereon and an appeal, but there are no pleadings nor an agreed state of facts in lieu thereof, that we might see the contention of the parties, and that the court below had jurisdiction of the cause of action.

The court would permit the pleadings to be filed in this Court nunc pro tunc (Rule 26), so as not to delay the hearing, but as both parties are not able to do this, the cause must be remanded. The case is substantially the same as Daniel v. Rogers, 95 N.C. 134; Rowland v. Mitchell, 90 N.C. 649.

Remanded.

Cited: Ferrabow v. Green, 110 N.C. 415.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WYATT v. R. R
(Sep 1, 1891)