Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GALVESTON, HARRISBURG SAN ANTONIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. J. C. COOPER.

Practice — Absence of Assignment of Error. — Questions not presented by assignment of errors should not be considered on appeal by the Courts of Civil Appeals, and will not be considered by this court on application for writ of error.

STAYTON, CHIEF JUSTICE.

The motion for rehearing, as well as the application for writ of error, seek to raise some questions that do not appear to have been presented by assignments of error.

These were properly disregarded by the Court of Civil Appeals, and must be by this court, without intimating any opinion that if fully considered any other result than that reached by the Court of Civil Appeals could legally have been arrived at.

The questions passed upon were properly decided, although the application made of some cases cited may not have been strictly correct.

The application for writ of error will be refused.

Application refused.

Delivered March 9, 1893.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

G. H. S. A. RY. CO. v. COOPER
(Mar 9, 1893)