Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN McDERMOTT et al. vs. ENOS LAPHAM et als.

The appointment by a town council of supervisors of elections under Pub. Laws R.I. cap. 920, § 16, of May 1, 1891, is a peremptory duty and whether or not the names of the candidates have been presented by a proper political committee is not a jurisdictional matter which can be reviewed on certiorari.

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the question whether or not a list of names from which supervisors are to be selected is presented by a proper town committee, is not a jurisdictional fact, and therefore not reviewable on a petition for a writ of certiorari. The statute, Pub. Laws R.I. cap. 920, § 16, of May 1, 1891, makes it the peremptory duty of the town council to appoint supervisors who shall be of the opposite political parties; the provision that they are to be selected from a list presented by the town committees of the opposite political parties appears to be incidental to the appointment as affording a convenient mode of furnishing names to the council from which to make a selection. It would apparently be their duty to make the appointment whether the lists were presented to them or not.

Petition denied and dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McDERMOTT v. LAPHAM
(Jun 3, 1893)