Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MANCHESTER v. WARREN a.

If A and B jointly contract with C to do certain work, and agree with each other that one shall do a definite part of the work and the other the remainder, neither having control over the other in the performance of his part, A is not liable to a stranger for an injury caused by B in doing his part of the work.

CHASE, J.

The liability of Warren to the plaintiffs for Beede's acts depends upon the relation existing between him and Beede, and not upon that existing between the two jointly and the owner of the lot. By their agreement with each other, Warren had no right to control Beede's action in the performance of his part of the contract. Beede was not Warren's agent or servant, but an independent contractor. The leaving of the logs in the highway being an independent act of his, he alone is responsible for it. 2 Thomp. Neg. 899; Shearm. Red. Neg., s. 76 et seq.; Carter v. Berlin Mills, 58 N.H. 52.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MANCHESTER v. WARREN
(Jun 1, 1893)