Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IRON SILVER MINING COMPANY v. MIKE AND STARR GOLD AND SILVER MINING COMPANY.

BREWER, J.

Case No. 3, between the same parties, presents the same questions, and the same judgment of affirmance will be entered therein.

FIELD, J., dissenting.

This case presents the same questions which are considered in the case of a similar title, No. 2, just decided, only that the former relates to the Goodell lode claim and the latter to the Gardener lode claim.

The two cases were tried together upon the same testimony, subject to the same objections and exceptions, and the instructions given by the court were so worded as to apply to both. I dissent from the judgment in this case for the reasons expressed in my dissent from the judgment in the former case.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BROWN concur in this dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IRON SILVER MINING v. MIKE STARR GOLD SILVER MINING
(Feb 29, 1892)