Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

INDIANAPOLIS AND VINCENNES RAILROAD COMPANY v. BACKUS.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER delivered the opinion of the court.Page 439

Case No. 900, brought by the Indianapolis and Vincennes Railroad Company to impeach the assessment made by the same board, in the same year, of its property, is so nearly like this in its material features that no separate statement of the special facts is necessary, and in that case, too, the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana will be

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BROWN dissented from the opinion and judgment upon the ground stated in their dissenting opinion in Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago St. Louis Railway Company v. Backus, No. 899, ante, 421, 437.

MR. JUSTICE JACKSON did not hear the argument in this case or take any part in its decision.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

INDIANAPOLIS AND VINCENNES RAILROAD COMPANY v. BACKUS
(May 26, 1894)